Listen and subscribe to Decoding Retirement on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you discover your favorite podcasts.
Those saving for retirement have long viewed traditional individual retirement accounts (IRAs) as the last word savings vehicle, offering pre-tax savings, tax-free growth, and a superb deal for beneficiaries of inherited IRAs.
Nonetheless, people should stop pondering that’s the case, in response to Ed Slott, writer of “The Retirement Savings Time Bomb Ticks Louder.”
Recent legislative changes have stripped IRAs of all their redeeming qualities, Slott said in a recent episode of Decoding Retirement (see video above or listen below). They are actually “probably the worst possible asset to go away to beneficiaries for wealth transfer, estate planning, and even to get your individual money out,” he stated.
This embedded content just isn’t available in your region.
Many American households have an IRA. As of 2023, 41.1 million US households owned about $15.5 trillion in individual retirement accounts, with traditional IRAs accounting for the biggest share of this total, in response to the Investment Company Institute.
Slott, who’s widely thought to be America’s IRA expert, explained that IRAs were a superb idea after they were first created. “You bought a tax deduction, and beneficiaries could do what we used to call the stretch IRA, he said. “So it had some good qualities.”
But IRAs were at all times tough to work with due to the minefield of distribution rules, he continued. “It was like an obstacle course simply to get your money out,” Slott said. “Your personal money. It was ridiculous.”
In accordance with Slott, IRA account owners put up with the minefield of rules because the advantages on the back end were a superb deal. “But now those advantages are gone,” Slott said.
IRAs were especially attractive once due to the “stretch IRA” profit that allowed the beneficiary of an inherited IRA to stretch required withdrawals over 30, 40, and even 50 years, potentially spreading out tax payments and allowing the account to grow tax-deferred for an extended period.
Nonetheless, recent legislative changes, particularly the SECURE Act, have eliminated the stretch IRA withdrawal strategy and replaced it with a 10-year rule that now requires most beneficiaries to withdraw the total account balance inside a decade, potentially causing significant tax implications.
That 10-year rule is a tax trap waiting to occur, in response to Slott. If forced to take required minimum distributions (RMDs), many Americans may find themselves paying taxes on those withdrawals at higher rates than they anticipated.
One approach to avoid that is to take distributions long before they’re required to reap the benefits of the low tax rates, including the 22% and 24% tax rates, and the big tax brackets, Slott said.
For account owners who only take the minimum required distribution, Slott offered this: The tax bill doesn’t go away by taking the minimum; actually, it would get even larger.
“Minimums shouldn’t drive the tax planning,” he said. “The tax planning should drive the distribution planning, not the minimum.”
The query account owners should ask is that this: How much can you’re taking out at low rates?
“Start now,” Slott added. “Start getting that cash out.”
Slott also advised traditional IRA account owners to convert those accounts into Roth IRAs.
The account owner would pay taxes on the distribution from the standard IRA, but once within the Roth IRA, the cash would grow tax-free, distributions could be tax-free, and there could be no required minimum distributions.
“Take that cash out into Roths using today’s low rates,” Slott said. “That is the way you beat this game. That is the way you make the tax rules compound in your favor quite than against you.”
Converting to a Roth IRA essentially places a bet on future tax rates, Slott explained. Most individuals think they’ll be in a lower bracket in retirement because they will not have a W-2 income.
But that is actually the No. 1 myth in retirement planning, Slott said, and in the event you ignore this issue, the IRA continues to grow like a weed, and the tax bill compounds against you.
“The profit for the Roth is you recognize what today’s rates are,” he said. “You are on top of things. … You avoid the uncertainty of what future higher taxes do.”
Senior couple paying bills at kitchen table. (Getty Images) ·MoMo Productions via Getty Images
Slott also advised those saving for retirement to stop contributing to a conventional 401(k) and begin contributing to a Roth 401(k).
While staff contributing to a Roth 401(k) won’t reduce their current taxable income, Slott explained that that profit is simply a short lived deduction anyway. Contributions to a conventional 401(k) may be more accurately described as “an exclusion” from income, wherein your W-2 income is reduced by the quantity you place into the 401(k).
In essence, it’s “a loan you are taking from the federal government to be repaid on the worst possible time in retirement if you don’t even understand how high the rates might go,” Slott said. “In order that’s a trap.”
One other approach to reduce the tax trap that comes with being a conventional IRA account owner is to contemplate a professional charitable distribution.
Individuals aged 70 and a half or older can donate as much as $105,000 directly from a conventional IRA to qualified charities. This strategy helps donors avoid increasing their taxable income, which may keep them out of upper tax brackets.
“For those who’re charitably inclined, you may get money out at 0% in the event you give it to charity,” Slott said. “That is an excellent provision. The one negative with that’s that not enough people can reap the benefits of it. It’s only available to IRA owners who’re 70 and a half years old or older.”
Slott also noted that the income tax exemption for all times insurance is the one biggest profit within the tax code and just isn’t used nearly enough. And life insurance will help people achieve three financial goals: larger inheritances for his or her beneficiaries, more control, and fewer tax.
“You’ll be able to get to the ‘promised land’ with life insurance,” Slott said.
