If California were its own country, it might be one in all the biggest in population and GDP size. It’s also one in all the biggest issuers of municipal bonds. So, when anything potentially impacts its population, economic status, tax collection, or otherwise, muni investors take notice. And at once, they’re taking notice in a giant way.
The impact of the recent wildfires in several key California cities and regions is just beginning to be known.
For current and would-be investors within the muni space, the query stays: what exactly will come from California bonds, and if the wildfire-insured volatility be a chance to bet big on the state’s reliance and its credits?
Unprecedented Damage
Fueled by hurricane-forced Santa Ana winds and severe drought conditions, two separate most important wildfires and a number of other smaller fires quickly spread across the Pacific Palisades, Malibu, Altadena, and Pasadena neighborhoods in California. The severity of the fires has been significant. At first estimate, greater than 41,,000 acres have been burned, while greater than 12,000 structures have been damaged or destroyed, including quite a lot of economic hot spots throughout the state.
While the fires are finally out, loss tallies for the economic and insurance burden are only starting to be made — and the initial results aren’t good.
A preliminary estimate by weather data and forecaster AccuWeather predicts damage and economic losses to be between $135 billion and $150 billion. Putting that into perspective, the whole damage from the wildfires might be as much as 4% of the annual GDP for the state of California. Insurer Aon predicts that the L.A. County fire will probably be the most expensive wildfire in U.S. history — a view shared by Moody’s. The previous costliest wildfire U.S. was also a California fire:: 2018’s Camp Fire in Paradise, which had losses of $12.5 billion, adjusted for inflation.
And now with the last embers smoldering, many insurers have released their loss estimates. For instance, Allstate reported losses of $1.1 billion, while Travelers has pegged its burden at $1.7 billion.
Content continues below commercial
California’s Muni Bonds
While insurance losses from the wildfires are expected from the wildfires, bond investors have a singular position. California is one in all the issuers of muni debt. It’s the only largest, with greater than $675 billion price of municipal bonds outstanding. Its sheer size and scope make California state and city bonds a staple of practically every municipal bond fund. For instance, the S&P Municipal Bond Index has about 17% of its portfolio in California bonds.
So, wildfires are everyone’s problem throughout the municipal bond sector. And investors have began to react accordingly. Yields have begun to rise for Californian debt, with the S&P Municipal Bond California Index producing a negative 0.7% total return for the 12 months up to now. While that won’t seem too bad, for the boring muni market, it’s not great.
Furthermore, many individual issuers have began to comprehend downgrades. The Los Angeles Department of Power and Water (LADWP) — the biggest muni issuer within the affected area — recently received downgrades from each Moody’s and S&P Global. LADWP-issued bonds’ yields have spiked over 100 basis points. Altadena public library bonds, which have largely traded at or above par since their issue, at the moment are trading for about 94 cents on the dollar.
While there could also be a number of loss potential and reasons to be concerned, history and funds could also be on the side of investors.
For one thing, California’s funds are still pretty good, and insurance should give you the chance to select up the check. Currently, California’s state government has $21 billion in its rainy-day fund and borrowable resources of around $90 billion. Los Angeles County contains a general fund reserve of $5.4 billion. That’s a number of money helping to pay for already-issued municipal bonds.
Secondly, insurance and federal aid will go an extended method to recouping the prices of the disaster. Before leaving office, President Biden approved a Major Disaster Declaration for the state, allowing California and its local governments to reap the benefits of Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) assistance, which has historically covered about 75% of emergency costs for local governments.
At the identical, the California FAIR Plan Association, which is a syndicate of insurers, provides basic fire coverage to California residents when traditional carriers are unavailable. Here again, losses for fires will probably be covered.
Then there’s a historical context to think about. In response to Moody’s, no municipal bond rated by the agency has ever defaulted as a consequence of a natural disaster. This chart highlights the reliance of muni bonds during natural disasters.
Source: Charles Schwab
Then there’s wildfire precedence to think about. The previous Camp Fire destroyed the town of Paradise. Nonetheless, the bonds issued by the municipality made all their scheduled debt-service payments within the wake of the disaster and currently have recovered to a stable outlook and A rating by S&P. Federal and state funding helped keep the bonds paying their coupons and maintaining their high rating.
Strong Potential
The California wildfires were beyond tragic, and the losses of property lives, and economic growth will hit hard on a societal level. But they shouldn’t affect the general municipal bond market or California-specific bonds. While risks remain for smaller issuers throughout the state, the general state’s bonds and broader municipal market should bounce back just tremendous over the long run.
This might make buying California munis or the broader muni market a straightforward decision.
California Municipal Bond ETFs
These ETFs were chosen based on their ability to supply low-cost exposure to the California municipal bond market. They’re sorted by their YTD total return, which ranges from 2.71% to 4.1%. They’ve expense ratios between 0.08% and 0.65% and assets under management between $25M and $2.8B. They’re currently yielding between 2.7% and three.75%.
Ticker | Name | AUM | YTD Total Ret (%) | Yield (%) | Exp Ratio | Security Type | Actively Managed? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWZ | Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF | $829M | 4.1% | 3.23% | 0.28% | ETF | No |
FCAL | First Trust California Municipal High income ETF | $223M | 3.8% | 2.92% | 0.65% | ETF | Yes |
MMCA | NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF | $25.7M | 3.1% | 3.74% | 0.37% | ETF | Yes |
CMF | iShares California Muni Bond ETF | $2.79B | 2.8% | 2.73% | 0.08% | ETF | No |
VTEC | Vanguard California Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | $35.2M | NA | 2.71% | 0.08% | ETF | No |
This may increasingly be a time when energetic management could make a difference. Lively managers could potentially avoid the troubled areas of California while specializing in the very best of the state. That would help drive returns and overall yield.
In the long run, disaster is hard to navigate on many levels. Nonetheless, municipal bonds will not be one in all them. California’s funds remain strong, and history tells a story of resilience for California and other states hit hard by natural disasters. This time shouldn’t be any different.
Bottom Line
As the biggest municipal bond issuer and one in all the largest states when it comes to GDP, anything that affects California needs to be taken seriously. Wildfires are not any exception. Nonetheless, slightly than run from the state’s munis, investors needs to be buying. Historically, California needs to be just tremendous.