Once the fanfare of Donald Trump’s inauguration fades, Congress has to get to work on taxes — and it won’t be pretty.
At issue is the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, which was an indicator of Trump’s first term. Abbreviated TCJA, the law made sweeping changes to the U.S. tax code that slashed the typical person’s income taxes by about $1,600 in 2018 (but benefited wealthy households probably the most).
Several key provisions within the TCJA expire at the tip of 2025, leading Trump and the Republican Party to vow during their campaigns last fall to make the changes everlasting if elected. The GOP platform specifically said it desired to cement the policies “that doubled the usual deduction, expanded the Child Tax Credit, and spurred Economic Growth.” That is along with nixing taxes on suggestions and pursuing other cuts.
Now the election is within the rearview, and the TCJA’s No. 1 fan is back within the Oval Office. Republicans have a majority within the House and Senate, but each margins are very narrow, leaving little room for defectors. To ensure that his tax cuts to pass as intended, Trump needs each vote he can get.
So what happens next?
There isn’t any easy answer to that query, however the drama has already begun. On Jan. 5, the president-elect posted on Truth Social that “members of Congress are attending to work on one powerful Bill” that touches on border security, American energy and renewing his tax cuts, relatively than tackling each topic individually as previously thought.
“Republicans must unite, and quickly deliver these Historic Victories for the American People,” he wrote. “Get smart, tough, and send the Bill to my desk to sign as soon as possible.”
Although all the pieces Trump says must be taken with a grain of salt — he also claimed in his post that his 2017 tax cuts “were the most important in History,” which isn’t true — his stance will guide the legislative agenda within the near future. Experts say his signature confidence, nevertheless, may be overblown.
“I do not think you’ll be able to take without any consideration that if the president says he wants a certain thing done, it will be done that way when you may have such a skinny margin,” Bob Dietz, national director of tax research at Bernstein Private Wealth Management, says.
What’s at stake
Even in the event you’re not a politics junkie, it’s price maintaining a tally of the Trump tax debate due to its potential impact in your wallet.
For instance, one in every of the expiring TCJA provisions is the rise to the usual deduction, which is claimed by 90% of taxpayers. In accordance with the Brookings Institution, the usual deduction for a married couple filing jointly might be $16,525 in 2026 if the policy is not prolonged. Whether it is, their standard deduction might be about $30,725.
Individual income tax rates could also be affected, too. The TCJA slashed the highest marginal tax rate to 37%; if this rule expires, it could rebound to its previous level of 39.6%, in accordance with the Tax Foundation.
Consider that it’s unlikely the TCJA might be prolonged in its entirety, says Jim Bertles, head of wealth planning at AlTi Tiedemann Global.
“The Trump administration [and] the Republican Party [have] been saying for a while that they need to quote-unquote ‘reduce taxes,’ and that translates into, in the event that they can get away with it, extending the TCJA,” he says. “Not all of the provisions of the TCJA, in the event that they’re prolonged, are favorable to taxpayers.”
Bertles says the most affordable, most consumer-friendly policies are probably the lowest-hanging fruit. But those perks aren’t even across the board.
An evaluation published by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy found that Trump’s tax proposals would cut taxes for the wealthiest 5% of Americans — and lift them for other income groups. The Tax Foundation, for its part, has estimated that 62% of filers would see their taxes go up if the TCJA expires.
How one can pay for it
Dietz says the value tag related to the TCJA is controversial — and a difficulty that is prone to extend the discussion on Capitol Hill. It isn’t going to be low cost: Last May, the Congressional Budget Office said extending the expiring individual income tax provisions for one more decade would add $3.3 trillion to the national deficit.
The president-elect has repeatedly overrated his plan to enact tariffs, or taxes on imported goods, on countries like Mexico and China as a technique to pay for the tax changes (in addition to create U.S. manufacturing jobs and slash the national deficit).
But which will have “real consequences to consumers,” Dietz says.
Many economists have raised alarm that firms may raise their prices with the intention to deal with the tariffs, hitting the pocketbooks of on a regular basis Americans. (Some executives, just like the CEO of AutoZone, have explicitly said as much.) The Peterson Institute for International Economics reported in August that the Trump tariffs would cost the typical U.S. household over $2,600 annually.
“There’s not necessarily entire consensus on that, but there’s a risk that prices increase consequently of those tariffs,” Dietz adds.
For a president obsessive about public opinion and who partially campaigned on lowering prices, that could be a tricky pill to swallow. The identical may very well be true for among the lawmakers Trump needs on board to pass TCJA 2.0 — not all of whom agree with the thought of using tariffs to generate revenue.
One query that looms larger than the remainder is when, exactly, this may occasionally get done. House Speaker Mike Johnson told Fox News he desires to get the “one big, beautiful bill” passed inside the first 100 days of Trump’s presidency “because we’ll begin to see the results of the economy in a short time, and that might be necessary for the midterm elections in two years.”
But having the 2025 debate wrapped up by May may be ambitious, Dietz says. Given the tight margin and wide selection of opinions, he says “it’ll be tough to get everybody on board” in only a matter of weeks.
“There’s just a number of pieces up within the air,” Dietz says.
While any laws is all but certain to face opposition from the Democrats, there’s disagreement even amongst Republicans about find out how to address the deduction for state and native taxes, or SALT, and the single-bill approach. (“It took us months to do the primary tax cuts bill nine years ago,” Andy Harris, R-Md., told Fox News earlier this month. “The underside line is that if that is what the president wants, he’ll must wait until the summer to get all of it ironed out.”)
Consumers should keep in mind that regardless of the final result is won’t be everlasting, Dietz says. It’s smart to be prepared regardless, though.
Bertles likes to view the uncertainty as a possibility. To date, his approach has been to say, “let’s plan as if these tax law changes are favorable to you … after which let’s put enough flexibility within the documents in order that in the event that they don’t change” you are still protected.
More from Money:
These 9 States Are Cutting Income Taxes in 2025
2025 Tax Brackets: IRS Bumps Up Income Cutoffs and Standard Deduction
Here’s How Much Time and Money America Spends Doing Taxes Every 12 months