by Chris Black

I get how a liberal could want social programs, because it’s mainly more cash for them taken from another person: immoral but understood, more resources to your, less for another person. 

But why is the primary response of liberals in an altercation to criticize the person reacting to being assaulted and never the person starting the violence?

Do they simply assume nothing bad will ever occur to them and thus can’t empathize with someone being genuinely victimized? 

I can’t see what they might gain from outlawing self-defense. 

If anything, liberals usually tend to be assaulted since they’re weaker physically.

Also this jogged my memory of a story just a few years ago a couple of home invader being killed by the homeowner, I believe with an AR-15. 

The invader’s grandfather said that it “wasn’t fair” for the homeowner to make use of a gun.

The reply is:  Anarcho-Tyranny

“Anarcho-tyranny” is defined this manner: “we refuse to manage real criminals (that’s the anarchy) so we control the innocent (that’s the tyranny).” 

The federal government functions normally, violent crime stays a relentless, making a climate of fear (anarchy). “laws which can be purported to protect odd residents against odd criminals” routinely go unenforced, though the state is “perfectly capable” of doing so.

 While this problem rages on, government elites concentrate their interests on law-abiding residents. In truth, Middle America winds up on the receiving end of each anarchy and tyranny.

The laws which can be enforced are either those that reach or entrench the ability of the state and its allies and internal elites … or else they’re the laws that directly punish those recalcitrant and “pathological” elements in society who insist on behaving in keeping with traditional norms—individuals who don’t prefer to pay taxes, wear seat belts, or deliver their children to the mind-bending therapists who run the general public schools; or the individuals who own and keep firearms, display and even wear the Confederate flag, put up Christmas trees, spank their children, and quote the Structure or the Bible—not to say dissident political figures who actually run for office.